Lecanemab-irmb (Leqembi)
Number: 1026
Table Of Contents
PolicyApplicable CPT / HCPCS / ICD-10 Codes
Background
References
Policy
Scope of Policy
This Clinical Policy Bulletin addresses lecanemab-irmb (Leqembi) for commercial medical plans. For Medicare criteria, see Medicare Part B Criteria.
Note: Requires Precertification:
Precertification of lecanemab-irmb (Leqembi) is required of all Aetna participating providers and members in applicable plan designs. For precertification of lecanemab-irmb (Leqembi), call (866) 752-7021 or fax (888) 267-3277. For Statement of Medical Necessity (SMN) precertification forms, see Specialty Pharmacy Precertification.
Note: Site of Care Utilization Management Policy applies. For information on site of service for lecanemab-irmb (Leqembi), see Utilization Management Policy on Site of Care for Specialty Drug Infusions.
-
Exclusions
Coverage will not be provided for members with any of the following conditions:
- Suspected neurodegenerative etiology of cognitive impairment other than Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including but not limited to frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) or Lewy body disease (i.e., meeting consensus criteria for possible or probable dementia with Lewy bodies);
- History of transient ischemic attacks (TIA), stroke, or seizures within the past 12 months;
- Bleeding disorder that is not under adequate control (including a platelet count less than 50,000 or international normalized ratio [INR] greater than 1.5);
- Leqembi will not be used in combination with any other amyloid beta-directed antibodies (e.g., aducanumab, donanemab-azbt).
-
Prescriber Specialties
This medication must be prescribed by or in consultation with a geriatrician, neurologist, psychiatrist, or neuropsychiatrist.
-
Criteria for Initial Approval
Aetna considers lecanemab-irmb (Leqembi) medically necessary for treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) [except as outlined in Section I for exclusions] when all of the following criteria are met:
-
Member must meet one of the following criteria:
- Member is 50 years of age or older; or
- If less than 50 years of age, member has a genetic mutation in amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin-1 (PSEN1), or presenilin-2 (PSEN2), or other clinical documentation to support early onset AD; and
- Member must have mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD dementia; and
- Member must have objective evidence of cognitive impairment at baseline (see Appendix A); and
- Member must have one of the following scores at baseline on any of the following assessment tools:
- Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1 (see Appendix B); or
- Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score of 21 - 30 (see Appendix C); or
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of greater than or equal to 16 (see Appendix D); and
-
Member must meet one of the following criteria:
- Have a positron emission tomography (PET) scan confirming the presence of amyloid pathology; or
- Have results from a lumbar puncture confirming at least one of the following detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as determined by the lab assay:
- Presence of elevated phosphorylated tau (P-tau) protein and/or elevated total tau (T-tau) protein, and reduced beta amyloid-42 (AB42); or
- Low AB42/AB40 ratio; or
- Elevated P-tau/AB42 ratio; or
- Elevated T-tau/AB42 ratio; and
- Member must have a recent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within one year prior to initiating treatment to evaluate for pre-existing Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA); and
- Member meets one of the following regarding apolipoprotein E ε4 (ApoE ε4) status:
- Genotype testing for ApoE ε4 status has been performed prior to initiation of treatment to inform member of the risk of developing ARIA; or
- Genotype testing has not been performed and the prescriber has informed the member that it cannot be determined if they are ApoE ε4 homozygous and may be at higher risk for ARIA; and
- If there is concurrent use of antithrombotic medications (aspirin, other antiplatelets, or anticoagulants), the member has been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to initiation of the requested medication; and
- Member and/or provider must currently be participating in a provider-enrolled patient registry that collects information on treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (e.g., Alzheimer’s Network for Treatment and Diagnostics (ALZ-NET)).
Aetna considers all other indications as experimental, investigational, or unproven.
-
-
Continuation of Therapy
Aetna considers continuation of lecanemab-irmb (Leqembi) therapy medically necessary for treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) [except as outlined in Section I for exclusions] when the criteria outlined below are met.
-
Continuation of therapy for 12 months (first reauthorization after the initial 7-month approval period) when all of the following criteria are met:
- Member has met all initial authorization criteria at the time of initial approval; and
- Member has been evaluated for evidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) on MRI prior to the 5th dose, 7th dose, and 14th dose (see Appendix E)
-
For members with radiographic evidence of amyloid related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E):
-
Dosing may continue based on clinical judgment, if applicable, for members that meet the following criteria:
Member has mild ARIA-E on MRI and is asymptomatic or has mild clinical symptoms; or -
Dosing should be suspended until MRI demonstrates radiographic resolution and symptoms resolve for members that meet any of the following criteria:
- Member has mild ARIA-E on MRI and has moderate or severe clinical symptoms; or
- Member has moderate ARIA-E on MRI and is asymptomatic or has mild, moderate, or severe clinical symptoms; or
- Member has severe ARIA-E on MRI and is asymptomatic or has mild, moderate, or severe clinical symptoms; or
-
-
For members with radiographic evidence of amyloid related imaging abnormalities-hemosiderin deposition (ARIA-H):
-
Dosing may continue for members that meet the following criteria:
Member has mild ARIA-H on MRI and is asymptomatic; or
-
Dosing should be suspended until MRI demonstrates radiographic stabilization and symptoms resolve for members that meet any of the following criteria:
- Member has mild ARIA-H on MRI and is symptomatic; or
- Member has moderate ARIA-H on MRI and is asymptomatic or symptomatic; or
- Member has severe ARIA-H on MRI and is asymptomatic or symptomatic; and
-
-
-
Member and/or provider continues to participate in a provider-enrolled patient registry that collects information on treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (e.g., Alzheimer’s Network for Treatment and Diagnostics (ALZ-NET)).
-
Continuation of therapy for 12 months (reauthorizations beyond initial 19 months of therapy) when all of the following criteria are met:
- Member has met all initial authorization criteria at the time of initial approval; and
- Member has a positive clinical response as evidenced by stabilization or slowing of disease progression as documented by any of the following (Note: Repeat assessment tool(s) must be the same tool that was submitted upon initial request):
- CDR-Global Score (i.e., score of 0.5 or 1); or
- MMSE (i.e., decline of 3 points or less per year); or
- MoCA (i.e., score of greater than or equal to 16); and
Note: Continuation requests for members with assessment scores outside of the provided ranges (i.e. mild dementia) or who have progressed greater than the provided rate of decline may be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
-
Member and/or provider continues to participate in a provider-enrolled patient registry that collects information on treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (e.g., Alzheimer’s Network for Treatment and Diagnostics (ALZ-NET)).
-
-
Related CMS Coverage Guidance
This Clinical Policy Bulletin (CPB) supplements but does not replace, modify, or supersede existing Medicare Regulations or applicable National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) or Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs). The supplemental medical necessity criteria in this CPB further define those indications for services that are proven safe and effective where those indications are not fully established in applicable NCDs and LCDs. These supplemental medical necessity criteria are based upon evidence-based guidelines and clinical studies in the peer-reviewed published medical literature. The background section of this CPB includes an explanation of the rationale that supports adoption of the medical necessity criteria and a summary of evidence that was considered during the development of the CPB; the reference section includes a list of the sources of such evidence. While there is a possible risk of reduced or delayed care with any coverage criteria, Aetna believes that the benefits of these criteria – ensuring patients receive services that are appropriate, safe, and effective – substantially outweigh any clinical harms.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR):
42 CFR 417; 42 CFR 422; 42 CFR 423.
Internet-Only Manual (IOM) Citations:
CMS IOM Publication 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual; CMS IOM Publication 100-03 Medicare National Coverage Determination Manual.
Medicare Coverage Determinations:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Coverage Database [Internet]. Baltimore, MD: CMS; updated periodically. Available at: Medicare Coverage Center. Accessed November 7, 2023.
-
Related Policies
Dosage and Administration
Lecanemab-irmb is available as Leqembi and supplied for injection as 500 mg/5 mL (100 mg/mL) and 200 mg/2 mL (100 mg/mL) solution in single-dose vials for intravenous use only.
Dosage and administration instructions outlined in the label include the following:
- Confirm the presence of amyloid beta pathology prior to initiating treatment
- The recommended dosage is 10 mg/kg that must be diluted then administered as an intravenous infusion over approximately one hour, once every two weeks
- Obtain a recent baseline brain MRI prior to initiating treatment with Leqembi
- Obtain an MRI prior to the 5th, 7th, and 14th infusions. If radiographically observed ARIA occurs, treatment recommendations are based on type, severity, and presence of symptoms
- Dilution in 250 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, is required prior to administration
- Administer as an intravenous infusion over approximately one hour via a terminal low-protein binding 0.2 micron in-line filter.
See Table 1 and 2 for labeled recommendations for dosing interruptions in persons with amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). See Appendix E for ARIA MRI Classification Criteria.
Clinical Symptom SeverityFootnote1* | ARIA-E Severity on MRIFootnote2** | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
Asymptomatic | May continue dosing | Suspend dosingFootnote3*** | Suspend dosingFootnote3*** |
Mild | May continue dosing based on clinical judgment | Suspend dosingFootnote3*** | |
Moderate or Severe | Suspend dosingFootnote3*** |
Footnote1* Mild: discomfort noticed, but no disruption of normal daily activity. Moderate: discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity. Severe: incapacitating, with inability to work or to perform normal daily activity.
Footnote2** See Appendix E for MRI severity
Footnote3*** Suspend until MRI demonstrates radiographic resolution and symptoms, if present, resolve; consider a follow-up MRI to assess for resolution 2 to 4 months after initial identification. Resumption of dosing should be guided by clinical judgment.
Clinical Symptom Severity | ARIA-H Severity on MRIFootnote4† | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
Asymptomatic | May continue dosing | Suspend dosingFootnote5†† | Suspend dosingFootnote6††† |
Symptomatic | Suspend dosingFootnote5†† | Suspend dosingFootnote5†† |
Footnote4† See Appendix E for MRI severity.
Footnote5†† Suspend until MRI demonstrates radiographic stabilization and symptoms, if present, resolve; resumption of dosing should be guided by clinical judgment; consider a follow-up MRI to assess for stabilization 2 to 4 months after initial identification.
Footnote6††† Suspend until MRI demonstrates radiographic stabilization and symptoms, if present, resolve; use clinical judgment in considering whether to continue treatment or permanently discontinue Leqembi.
In persons who develop intracerebral hemorrhage greater than 1 cm in diameter during treatment with Leqembi, suspend dosing until MRI demonstrates radiographic stabilization and symptoms, if present, resolve. Per the label, use clinical judgment in considering whether to continue treatment after radiographic stabilization and resolution of symptoms or permanently discontinue Leqembi.
Source: Eisai, 2023b
Code | Code Description |
---|---|
Other CPT codes related to the CPB: |
|
0445U | B-amyloid (Abeta42) and phospho tau (181P) (pTau181), electro chemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA), cerebral spinal fluid, ratio reported as positive or negative for amyloid pathology |
62270 | Spinal puncture, lumbar, diagnostic |
70551 | Magnetic resonance (eg, proton) imaging, brain (including brain stem); without contrast material |
70552 | with contrast material(s) |
70553 | without contrast material, followed by contrast material(s) and further sequences |
78608 | Brain imaging, positron emission tomography (PET); metabolic evaluation |
81405 | Molecular pathology procedure, Level 6 full gene sequence PSEN1 (presenilin 1) (eg, Alzheimer disease) |
81406 | Molecular pathology procedure, Level 7 full gene sequence APP (amyloid beta [A4] precursor protein) (eg, Alzheimer disease), full gene sequence PSEN2 (presenilin 2 [Alzheimer disease 4]) (eg, Alzheimer disease) |
96365 – 96368 | Intravenous infusion administration |
96413 - 96417 | Chemotherapy administration |
HCPCS codes covered if selection criteria are met: |
|
J0174 | Injection, lecanemab-irmb, 1 mg |
Other HCPCS codes related to the CPB: |
|
A9586 | Florbetapir f18, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 10 millicuries |
A9598 | Positron emission tomography radiopharmaceutical, diagnostic, for non-tumor identification, not otherwise classified |
Q9982 | Flutemetamol F18, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 5 millicuries |
S3852 | DNA analysis for APOE epsilon 4 allele for susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease |
ICD-10 codes covered if selection criteria are met: |
|
G30.0 – G30.9 | Alzheimer's disease |
G31.84 | Mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology [due to AD or mild AD dementia] |
ICD-10 codes not covered for indications listed in the CPB: |
|
D69.0 – D69.9 | Purpura and other hemorrhagic conditions |
G23.0 – C23.9 | Other degenerative diseases of basal ganglia |
G31.01 – G31.83, G31.85 – G31.9 | Other degenerative diseases of nervous system, not elsewhere classified |
G32.0 – G32.89 | Other degenerative disorders of nervous system in diseases classified elsewhere |
Z86.69 | Personal history of other diseases of the nervous system and sense organs [seizures] |
Z86.73 | Personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits |
Background
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Approved Indications
-
Leqembi is indicated for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Treatment with Leqembi should be initiated in patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease, the population in which treatment was initiated in clinical trials.
Lecanemab-irmb is an intravenous infusion available as Leqembi (Eisai Inc.). Lecanemab-irmb is a humanized immunoglobulin gamma 1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody directed against aggregated soluble (protofibril) and insoluble forms of amyloid beta (Aβ). In Alzheimer's disease (AD), it is believed that abnormal accumulation of proteins, such as amyloid beta (which form plaques in the extracellular spaces between the neurons of the brain), and tau (which are twisted fibers that form neurofibrillary tangles inside the neurons -- intracellular), leads to loss of synapses and neurons resulting in gross atrophy of the affected areas of the brain, manifesting into progressive memory and cognitive decline (Huang, 2021). Amyloid plaques typically appear earlier in the disease process, whereas tau tangles tend to appear later in the disease. "The Amyloid Theory largely states that if you were able to prevent the accumulation of beta amyloid, or clear existing amyloid, the progress of the cognitive and memory problems associated with Alzheimer’s would be slowed or prevented" (Terry, 2021). Lecanemab is believed to reduce the number of amyloid plaques present in the brain, potentially slowing neurodegeneration and disease progression.
The prescribing information includes a boxed warning for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Monoclonal antibodies directed against aggregated forms of beta amyloid can cause ARIA, characterized as ARIA with edema (ARIA-E), which can be observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as brain swelling or sulcal effusions, and ARIA with hemosiderin deposition (ARIA-H), which includes microhemorrhage and superficial siderosis. ARIA-H can occur spontaneously in patients with AD. ARIA-H associated with monoclonal antibodies directed against aggregated forms of beta amyloid generally occurs in association with an occurrence of ARIA-E. ARIA-H of any cause and ARIA-E can occur together. ARIA is usually asymptomatic, although serious and life-threatening events, including seizure and status epilepticus, rarely can occur. When present, reported symptoms associated with ARIA may include headache, confusion, visual changes, dizziness, nausea, and gait difficulty. Focal neurologic deficits may also occur. Symptoms associated with ARIA usually resolve over time. Healthcare providers will need to obtain a recent (within one year) brain MRI prior to initiating treatment with Leqembi. An MRI will also need obtained prior to the 5th, 7th, and 14th infusions (Eisai, 2023b).
The most common adverse reactions (at approximately 10% and higher incidence compared to placebo) included in clinical trials were infusion-related reactions, headache, and ARIA-edema.
In January 2023, the FDA, under the Accelerated Approval Pathway, approved Leqembi for treatment of AD. Leqembi treatment is to be initiated in patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease, the population in which treatment was initiated in clinical trials. There are no safety or effectiveness data on initiating treatment at earlier or later stages of the disease than were studied. The accelerated approval is based on reduction in amyloid beta plaques observed in patients treated with lecanemab (NCT01767311). Per the FDA, continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial.
Swanson et al (2021) conducted an 18-month, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled Bayesian design, dose finding study (Study 201; ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01767311) employing response adaptive randomization across placebo and 5 lecanemab arms to assess safety and efficacy in subjects with early AD. Participants were comprised of 2 subgroups: mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD dementia. All subjects were confirmed to be amyloid positive via amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ1–42. Key inclusion criteria included objective impairment in episodic memory (on Wechsler Memory Scale-IV Logical Memory II [WMS-IV LMII]), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score equal to or greater than 22 at screening and baseline (amended to MMSE 22–28 in EU, except Italy), and naïve to or on stable dose (12 weeks) of approved AD medications. Subjects were enrolled who had a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score of 0.5 or 1.0 and a Memory Box score of 0.5 or greater. The study had a 79-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period, followed by an open-label extension period for up to 260 weeks, which was initiated after a gap period (range 9 to 59 months; mean 24 months) off treatment. To maintain the blind, all subjects received biweekly infusions of either placebo or lecanemab. The study aimed to establish the effective dose 90% (ED90), defined as the simplest dose that achieves 90% or more of the maximum treatment effect. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at 12 months on the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) for the ED90 dose, which required an 80% probability of 25% or more clinical reduction in decline versus placebo. Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline at 18 months in brain amyloid by PET Standard Uptake Value ratio (SUVr) in an optional sub-study of consenting participants, ADCOMS, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum-of-Boxes (CDR-SB), Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog14), CSF biomarkers (optional sub-study), and total hippocampal volume using volumetric MRI. In the study, 856 subjects were randomized to receive one of 5 doses (161 of which were randomized to the recommended dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg every two weeks) of lecanemab or placebo (n=247). Of the total number of subjects randomized, 71.4% were ApoE ε4 carriers and 28.6% were ApoE ε4 non-carriers. During the study, the protocol was amended to no longer randomize ApoE ε4 carriers to the 10 mg/kg every two weeks dose arm. ApoE ε4 carriers who had been receiving lecanemab 10 mg/kg every two weeks for 6 months or less were discontinued from study drug. As a result, in the lecanemab 10 mg/kg every two weeks arm, 30.3% of patients were ApoE ε4 carriers and 69.7% were ApoE ε4 non-carriers. The authors found that at 12 months, the 10-mg/kg biweekly ED90 dose showed a 64% probability to be better than placebo by 25% on ADCOMS, which missed the 80% threshold for the primary outcome. At 18 months, 10-mg/kg biweekly lecanemab reduced brain amyloid (−0.306 SUVr units) while showing a drug-placebo difference in favor of active treatment by 27% and 30% on ADCOMS, 56% and 47% on ADAS-Cog14, and 33% and 26% on CDR-SB versus placebo according to Bayesian and frequentist analyses, respectively. CSF biomarkers were supportive of a treatment effect. The authors state that intravenous administration of lecanemab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks was well-tolerated with 9.9% incidence of ARIA-E at 10 mg/kg biweekly. The authors concluded that Study 201 did not meet the 12-month primary endpoint; however, the prespecified 18-month Bayesian and frquentist analyses demonstrated reduction in brain amyloid accompanied by a consistent reduction of clinical decline across several clinical and biomarker endpoints. The authors note that a phase 3 study (Clarity AD) in early AD is underway.
Swanson and colleagues (2021) acknowledged limitations in Study 201. "Most notably, a small number of symptomatic ARIA-E cases at 10 mg/kg biweekly prompted one Regulatory Authority to request that subsequent ApoE4+ subjects (approximately 70% of the overall study population) not be randomized to the 10 mg/kg biweekly dose. An additional component to the request required that all ApoE4+ subjects on 10 mg/kg biweekly who were on study but who had not yet reached 6 months of treatment be immediately discontinued (N = 25 subjects). Implementation of these actions led to early (initiated between 300 and 350 randomized participants) and significant changes to the study design that resulted in a marked imbalance in the number of ApoE4+ subjects on 10 mg/kg biweekly (30% ApoE4+ subjects). The Bayesian algorithm identified 10 mg/kg biweekly as the ED90 dose despite this imposed design limitation. The constraints in this analysis were specifically associated with the ED90 dose and therefore could have had an impact on the ability to interpret the results. The safety and efficacy of 10 mg/kg biweekly lecanemab is currently being evaluated in an open label extension to this study, and in the phase 3 lecanemab Clarity AD study, where there are no dosing restrictions based on ApoE status in either study."
van Dyck and colleagues (2023) conducted an 18-month, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial evaluating lecanemab in persons with early AD. The study (Clarity AD; NCT03887455) includes persons 50 to 90 years of age with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to AD with evidence of amyloid on PET or by CSF testing. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous lecanemab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks) or placebo. The primary end point was the change from baseline at 18 months in the score on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB; range, 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). Key secondary end points were the change in amyloid burden on PET, the score on the 14-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog14; range, 0 to 90; higher scores indicate greater impairment), the Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS; range, 0 to 1.97; higher scores indicate greater impairment), and the score on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL; range, 0 to 53; lower scores indicate greater impairment). A total of 1795 participants were enrolled, with 898 assigned to receive lecanemab and 897 to receive placebo. The authors found that the mean CDR-SB score at baseline was approximately 3.2 in both groups. The adjusted least-squares mean change from baseline at 18 months was 1.21 with lecanemab and 1.66 with placebo (difference, -0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.67 to -0.23; p<0.001). In a substudy involving 698 participants, there were greater reductions in brain amyloid burden with lecanemab than with placebo (difference, -59.1 centiloids; 95% CI, -62.6 to -55.6). Other mean differences between the two groups in the change from baseline favoring lecanemab were as follows: for the ADAS-cog14 score, -1.44 (95% CI, -2.27 to -0.61; p<0.001); for the ADCOMS, -0.050 (95% CI, -0.074 to -0.027; p<0.001); and for the ADCS-MCI-ADL score, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.8; p<0.001). Lecanemab resulted in infusion-related reactions in 26.4% of the participants and ARIA-E in 12.6%. The incidence of amyloid related imaging abnormalities-hemosiderin deposition (ARIA-H) was 17.3%. The incidence of ARIA, including symptomatic ARIA, was numerically lower than in similar clinical trials, but differences in the drugs used and in trial design do not allow direct comparisons. ARIA-E generally occurred in the first 3 months, was mild and asymptomatic, did not lead to discontinuation of lecanemab or placebo if mild, and resolved within 4 months. The authors note that the incidences of both overall and symptomatic ARIA-E were highest among ApoE ε4 homozygotes. The authors concluded that lecanemab reduced markers of amyloid in early AD and resulted in moderately less decline on measures of cognition and function than placebo at 18 months but was associated with adverse events. The authors acknowledge study limitations which includes data for only 18 months of treatment. The authors state that longer trials are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of lecanemab in early AD. Additional trials of lecanemab include a 5-year phase 2 long-term extension trial (NCT01767311) and a 4-year phase 3 long-term extension trial (NCT03887455) in early AD, the 4-year AHEAD 3-45 trial (NCT04468659) in preclinical AD, and the 4-year DIAN-TU (Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit) Next Generation trial (NCT05269394) in dominantly inherited AD.
On July 6, 2023, the FDA granted traditional approval for Leqembi for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease based on results from the phase 3 Clarity AD trial, which met its primary and key secondary endpoints showing statistically significant results for use of Leqembi in patients with MCI or mild dementia stage of disease. Leqembi was found to reduce clinical decline on CDR-SB by 27% at 18 months compared to placebo. Additionally, Leqembi slowed decline of activities of daily living by 37% on ADCS MCI-ADL at 18 months. "Leqembi demonstrated clinically meaningful slowing of cognitive and functional decline in a patient group generalizable to U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, which included a mix of racial and ethnic groups, patients with common comorbid conditions, concomitant medications and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD or mild AD". There are no safety or effectiveness data on initiating treatment at earlier or later stages of the disease than were studied (Biogen, 2023).
The label includes an updated black box warning regarding apolipoprotein (ApoE4) genotype status. Patients treated with Leqembi who are ApoE ε4 homozygotes have a higher incidence of ARIA, including symptomatic and serious ARIA, compared to heterozygotes and noncarriers. Testing for ApoE ε4 status should be performed prior to initiation of treatment to inform the risk of developing ARIA. Prior to testing, prescribers should discuss with patients the risk of ARIA across genotypes and the implications of genetic testing results. The most common adverse reactions (at approximately 10% and higher incidence compared to placebo) include infusion-related reactions, amyloid related imaging abnormality-microhemorrhages, amyloid related imaging abnormality edema/effusion, and headache (Eisai, 2023).
In December 2022, the FDA granted premarket notification for Roche Diagnostics' Elecsys β-Amyloid (1-42) CSF II and Elecsys phospho-tau (181P) CSF. These in vitro electrochemiluminescence immunoassays are indicated for the measurement of the β-amyloid (1-42) (Abeta42) and phospho-tau (181P) (pTau181) protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from adult patients aged 55 years and older being evaluated for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other causes of cognitive impairment to generate a pTau181/Abeta42 ratio value. A negative result, defined as pTau181/Abeta42 ratio value below cut-off or an Abeta42 value above the measuring range, is consistent with a negative amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan result. A negative result reduces the likelihood that a patient’s cognitive impairment is due to AD. A positive result, defined as pTau181/Abeta42 ratio value above cut-off, is consistent with a positive amyloid PET scan result. A positive result does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive disorder. The pTau181/Abeta42 ratio result is used as an adjunct to other clinical diagnostic evaluations. There are limitations for use. The performance of the pTau181/Abeta42 ratio has not been established for predicting development of dementia or other neurologic conditions, and monitoring responses to therapies.
In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ebell and colleagues (2024) evaluated clinically meaningful benefits and harms of monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. These investigators carried out a literature search using PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and 5 trial registries, as well as the reference lists of identified studies related to monoclonal antibodies. Randomized controlled trials comparing a monoclonal antibody with placebo at a dose consistent with that used in phase 3 trials or for U.S. FDA approval were included. Studies had to report at least 1 clinically relevant benefit or harm. Data were extracted independently by at least 2 researchers for random effects meta-analysis. Changes in cognitive and functional scales were compared between groups, and each difference was assessed to determine if it met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as the smallest change in a scale measuring cognition or function that is noticeable by the patient or their caregiver. The investigators identified 87 studies from PubMed and 71 from other sources, of which 16 were duplicates. A total of 142 records were screened and 41 underwent full text review. Exclusions included some studies that used subtherapeutic doses, studied an anti-Tau antibody, or were phase 1 studies. A total of 19 publications with 23,202 total participants that evaluated 8 anti-amyloid antibodies were used for final analysis. Most were 18 to 19 months in duration, and enrolled patients with mild cognitive impairment or with mild or moderate Alzheimer disease. Their analysis revealed small improvements over placebo in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)-Cog-11 to -14 score (standardized mean difference = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04), Mini Mental State Examination score (0.32 points; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50), and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scale score (mean difference =-0.18 points; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), and the combined functional scores (standardized mean difference = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.13). None of the changes, including those for lecanemab, aducanumab, and donanemab, exceeded the MCID. Harms included significantly increased risks of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA)-edema (relative risk [RR] = 10.29; number needed to harm [NNH] = 9), ARIA-hemorrhage (RR = 1.74; NNH = 13), and symptomatic ARIA-edema (RR = 24.3; NNH = 86). The investigators acknowledged limitations to their analysis. "All studies enrolled participants who underwent positron emission tomography scanning and/or cerebrospinal fluid analyses for amyloid, studies that are not typically done in current routine clinical practice. The included studies reported average changes on standard cognitive and functional scales, but did not report the percentage of participants achieving clinically meaningful differences in cognition or function from baseline. Such data would be more interpretable for clinicians and patients. Finally, studies had different inclusion criteria for severity of disease at baseline, which is a source of potential heterogeneity." The investigators concluded that although monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid provide small benefits on cognitive and functional scales in patients with Alzheimer dementia, these improvements are far below the MCID for each outcome and are associated with significant harms.
Appendix
Appendix A: Summary of Clinical and Cognitive Evaluation for MCI due to AD
- Cognitive concern reflecting a change in cognition reported by patient or informant or clinician (i.e., historical or observed evidence of decline over time)
- Objective evidence of impairment in one or more cognitive domains, typically including memory (i.e., formal or bedside testing to establish level of cognitive function in multiple domains)
- Preservation of independence in functional abilities
- Not demented
Source: Albert et al (2011)
Appendix B: Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale
The CDR is obtained through semi-structured interviews of patients and informants with cognitive functioning rated on a 5-point scale in the following domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. The score relates to the member’s level of dementia:
- 0 = Normal
- 0.5 = Very Mild Dementia
- 1 = Mild Dementia
- 2 = Moderate Dementia
- 3 = Severe Dementia
Source: Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center; Morris (1993); O'Bryant et al (2008)
Appendix C: Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written, 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point). The score relates to the member’s level of dementia:
- 25 - 30 suggests normal cognition
- 20 - 24 suggests mild dementia
- 13 - 20 suggests moderate dementia
- Less than 12 suggests severe dementia
Source: Folstein, Folstein, and McHugh (1975)
Appendix D: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Per MoCA assessment, average scores for the following ranges are:
- Mild Cognitive Impairment: 19 - 25
- Mild Dementia: 11 - 21
- Normal: 26 and above
Source: MoCA Test Inc, 2023; Nasreddine et al, 2019
Appendix E: ARIA MRI Classification Criteria
ARIA Type | Radiographic Severity | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
ARIA-E | FLAIR hyperintensity confined to sulcus and or cortex/subcortical white matter in one location less than 5 cm | FLAIR hyperintensity 5 to 10 cm in single greatest dimension, or more than 1 site of involvement, each measuring less than 10 cm | FLAIR hyperintensity greater than 10 cm with associated gyral swelling and sulcal effacement. One or more separate sites of involvement may be noted. |
ARIA-H microhemorrhage | less than or equal to 4 new incident microhemorrhages |
5 to 9 new incident microhemorrhages |
10 or more new incident microhemorrhages |
ARIA-H superficial siderosis | 1 focal area of superficial siderosis | 2 focal areas of superficial siderosis | greater than 2 focal areas of superficial siderosis |
Source: Eisai, 2023b
References
The above policy is based on the following references:
- Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270-279.
- Biogen Inc. FDA grants traditional approval for Leqembi (lecanemab-irmb) for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. News Release. Cambridge, MA: Biogen; July 6, 2023.
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). National Coverage Determination (NCD) for monoclonal antibodies directed against amyloid for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (200.3 – Version 1). Baltimore, MD: CMS; effective April 7, 2022. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/. Accessed May 4, 2023.
- Clark CM, Sheppard L, Fillenbaum GG, et al. Variability in annual mini-mental state examination score in patients with probable Alzheimer disease: A clinical perspective of data from the Consortium to Establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1999;56(7):857-62.
- Cummings J, Aisen P, Apostolova LG, et al. Aducanumab: Appropriate use recommendations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(4):398-410.
- Cummings J, Apostolova L, Rabinovici GD, et al. Lecanemab: Appropriate use recommendations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):362-377.
- Ebell MH, Barry HC, Baduni K, Grasso G. Clinically important benefits and harms of monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid for the treatment of Alzheimer disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2024;22(1):50-62.
- Eisai Inc. FDA approves Leqembi (lecanemab-irmb) under the accelerated approval pathway for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Press Release. Cambridge, MA: Eisai; January 6, 2023a.
- Eisai Inc. Leqembi (lecanemab-irmb) injection, for intravenous use. Prescribing Information. Nutley, NJ: Eisai; revised July 2023b.
- Fagan AM, Mintun MA, Mach RH, et al. Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(3):512-519.
- Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res.1975;12(3):189-98.
- Han L, Cole M, Bellavance F, et al. Tracking cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease using the mini-mental state examination: a meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr. 2000;12(2):231-47.
- Huang J. Alzheimer disease. Merck Manual Professional Version [online]. Rahway, NJ; Merck & Co., Inc.; revised March 2021. Available at: https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/neurologic-disorders/delirium-and-dementia/alzheimer-disease. Accessed February 1, 2023.
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center. CDR Dementia Staging Instrument [website]. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine at St. Louis; 2023. Available at: https://knightadrc.wustl.edu/cdr/cdr.htm. Accessed: May 4, 2023.
- MoCA Test Inc. MoCA Cognitive Assessment. Greenfield Park, QC: MoCA Test Inc.; 2023. Available at: https://www.mocatest.org/. Accessed: May 4, 2023.
- Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412-4.
- Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment [published correction appears in J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991]. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695-699.
- O'Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, et al. Staging dementia using Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes scores: A Texas Alzheimer's research consortium study. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1091-1095.
- Patrick RE, Hobbs K, Mathias L, et al. The limitations of using cognitive cutoff scores for enrollment in Alzheimer trials. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;27(10):1153-1158.
- Schindler SE, Gray JD, Gordon BA, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers measured by Elecsys assays compared to amyloid imaging. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(11):1460-1469.
- Swanson CJ, Zhang Y, Dhadda S, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase 2b proof-of-concept clinical trial in early Alzheimer's disease with lecanemab, an anti-Aβ protofibril antibody [published correction appears in Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 May 21;14(1):70]. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13(1):80.
- Swanson CJ, Zhang Y, Dhadda S, et al. Correction to: A randomized, double-blind, phase 2b proof-of-concept clinical trial in early Alzheimer's disease with lecanemab, an anti-Aβ protofibril antibody. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):70.
- Terry M. Biogen's aducanumab: A look a the drug's history and recent updates. BioSpace. March 26, 2021. Available at: https://www.biospace.com/article/biogen-s-aducanumab-a-look-at-the-drug-s-history-and-recent-updates/. Accessed February 1, 2023.
- Trzepacz PT, Hochstetler H, Wang S, et al; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:107.
- U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA). Elecsys β-amyloid (1-42) CSF II, Elecsys phospho-tau (181P) CSF. 510K no. K221842. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; December 7, 2022.
- van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):9-21.